The 69 Conspiracy on NFTs

At first glance, 69 Ducks and Moonboysz69 look like two unrelated meme collections on Kaspa: one is a small 69-piece duck drop, the other a larger Moonboyz-themed series. Yet the recurring obsession with the number 69 across both projects is impossible to ignore and has led the community to speculate that they might share the same creator.

The evidence is almost comically consistent:

• 69 Ducks: exactly 69 NFTs in the collection

• Mint price: 169 KAS (1 + 69)

• Images: obvious heavy AI generation (midjourney-style artifacts)

• Moonboysz69: mint price set at exactly 690 KAS (69 × 10)

• The “69” appears not once but twice in the branding (Moonboysz + 69 suffix)

The use of 69 isn’t subtle or coincidental here; it’s baked into the supply, pricing, and even the project names in a deliberate, almost signature-like way. When you combine that with both projects leaning on AI-generated art and launching in the same relatively narrow Kaspa NFT window, the pattern becomes hard to dismiss as random.

It’s also worth noting the pricing progression feels like an inside joke that only one person would keep running: start with a tiny 169 KAS duck mint, then scale the gag up tenfold to 690 KAS for the Moonboyz. Same humor, same number fetish, bigger budget.

Of course, this is still just a theory. Anyone can copy a meme number, and 69 has been internet poison for decades. Two different people could independently decide that 69-based pricing is peak comedy. But when literally every variable (supply, pricing multiple, naming convention, AI art style, and timing) lines up around the same number, the simplest explanation starts to look like a single dev having a private laugh across two wallets.

So until someone drops a smoking-gun wallet link or the creators openly admit it, we’ll file this under “very strong coincidence.” 69 Ducks + Moonboysz69 = probably the same anon, but officially… it’s just a theory. A very, very 69 theory.